Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Slavery in Groningen


Slavery in Groningen? I never thought about these things being connected before… When thinking about slavery, plantations in the Americas come to mind, or the trading and transporting of slaves by companies like the W.I.C. (Dutch West India Company). Little did I know about all the traces of the slave-trading past that can be found in the city centre of Groningen. And honestly, how could I have known?

Walking towards the Groninger Museum on a day quite hot and sunny for the time of year, I thought to myself: “What traces of slavery even are there in Groningen? Not like I’ve even seen them around the city, and I’ve been living here for two years now.” Little did I know how much Groningen’s past is tainted by slavery. At the Groninger museum, together with my classmates, I met up with dr. Barbara Henkes. Dr. Henkes has done quite some research on slavery in Groningen and currently she is working on a similar project in Friesland. In 2016 she published, together with Margriet Fokken, ‘Sporen van het slavernijverleden in Groningen. Gids voor Stad en Ommelanden’, a guide in which more than 60 locations have been brought together, containing a walking route in the city and several cycling routes in the province. On that hot and sunny day in June, Henkes was going to lead us around the city to show us traces of slavery. Just like with the previous field trip, the task for us students was to come up with a heritagescape for the sites visited. A heritagescape, designed by Garden (2006), is a new analytical approach to heritage sites. According to Garden “a heritage site is made up of the tangible components which can be recognized by a set of three guiding principles, which are: boundaries, cohesion, and visibility”.
Image 1. The cover of the book written by dr. Henkes, about the history of slavery in Groningen
As the sun was burning my skin, I walked past buildings that I had seen a million times before. However, they were now presented by dr. Henkes in a completely new light. She told many stories about colonialism in relation to the buildings, which I never would have known. And how could I have known? There are no signs or other visible marks that acknowledge the history that these buildings encompass. People walk by these buildings every day without knowing in which way these buildings are connected to the history of slavery in Groningen. For many people, the only way to find out about the history of slavery in connection to these buildings in the city, is by doing the city walk. I suddenly realized that even though there are lots of stories to be told on slavery in my own city, there is hardly any attention for them. This reminded me again of De Punt, due to the lack of recognition. How could it possibly be that places and events with such a great historical significance, are not commemorated? So, I started imagining..

Image 2. A former tabacco factory that
now serves as appartmentcomplex
It is hard to come up with one clear-cut way of making clear to the layman what happened at sites like these, for it is not only “dark history” but also most often private property which makes realizing memorials such as plaques and statues difficult. Of course, a walking route with small signs is an option, and I think it would be best in this case. The small signs would fence off and acknowledge the landscape of the heritage site and connect the different buildings dr Henkes showed us to each other. To stay with the times, people interested in the history of slavery in Groningen could download an app, and based on location listen to stories on their phone. This overcomes the problem of privately owned property, and also avoids the recognition of the Dutch state of “dark history” when this app is funded by foundations such as NiNsee and Stil Verleden. Then hopefully, everyone who lives in the city of Groningen or visits it, will get to know the history of slavery this city entails.



Authors: MMK, AE, EMvG, WvdV

Reacties

Populaire posts van deze blog

Cultural vs. natural heritage

Nature and culture only differ three letters, but the approach we take to them differs quite a bit. In this blog post we will take a closer look at the history of the Wadden Sea as an example of natural heritage and compare it with the cultural heritage example, the Woudagemaal. These two sites form striking dyptich of examples of natural and cultural heritage in Fryslân and will demonstrate what the different approaches towards them are. The Wadden Sea The Wadden Sea is an intertidal zone on the coast of the North Sea, stretching from the northern part of the Netherlands all the way along the German coast into Denmark, totalling about 10.000km ² in area. The landscape is characterized by wetlands and tidal flats, which flood regularly. In June of 2009, the Wadden Sea area was added to the UNESCO World Heritage list . The area is very rich in wildlife and fostered for its biodiversity. Image 1. An overview of a small part of the Wadden Sea. According to Lowenthal (2005

The commodification of Frisian culture and history - The Cultural Capital of Europe 2018

The fact/news that Leeuwarden is one of the two Cultural Capitals of Europe in 2018 has been hard to miss, especially so if you live in Fryslân. When such a large event is brought to a place, some justification is needed as to why thís city in particular is the right one for the event, and why thís particular event fits so perfectly into the local culture. The campaign that preceded Leeuwarden gaining the honor of the title of Cultural Capital has been a large and costly one, and such a PR campaign can give some interesting insights into the world of commercialization of cultural heritage and history. On the website of Cultural Capital Leeuwarden you can find statements such as “since the dawn of time, the people of Frisia had to work together to achieve their goals. Just look at the Middle Ages, when the Frisian Freedom accomplished that the Frisians did not serve under the rule of any lord. Or look at 1815, when the Netherlands became a kingdom, but with two official languages.” Or

Redbot, digital museums and the Web 2.0

Redbot, digital museums and the Web 2.0 In a world where individualisation is the name of the game, how do we still find that nostalgic sense of community? In ‘ye olden days’, ones world was confined to the borders of his village or the lineage of his family, whereas now there are a few Namibian people in Newfoundland, a few Somalians in Slovakia and perhaps even some Friulians in Finland. How do these people stay in touch with their history? The internet offers a great podium for this, with digital renditions of landmarks from your area of origin sometimes thousands of kilometers away, yet ‘reachable’ with a few mouse clicks. An example of the potential the internet has to offer regarding cultural heritage, is Redbot . This site functions as a hub for all Frisian digital heritage, with the name being a play on the legendary king Redbad , who led the Frisian people in their golden age. This pun is quite relevant, because the aim of the site is to spread Frisian culture, or at